On Generating Plausible Counterfactual and Semi-Factual Explanations for Deep Learning

نویسندگان

چکیده

There is a growing concern that the recent progress made in AI, especially regarding predictive competence of deep learning models, will be undermined by failure to properly explain their operation and outputs. In response this disquiet, counterfactual explanations have become very popular eXplainable AI (XAI) due asserted computational, psychological, legal benefits. contrast however, semi-factuals (which appear equally useful) surprisingly received no attention. Most methods address tabular rather than image data, partly because non-discrete nature images makes good counterfactuals difficult define; indeed, generating plausible which lie on data manifold also problematic. This paper advances novel method for black-box CNN classifiers doing computer vision. The present method, called PlausIble Exceptionality-based Contrastive Explanations (PIECE), modifies all “exceptional” features test “normal” from perspective class, generate images. Two controlled experiments compare others literature, showing PIECE generates highly (and best semi-factuals) several benchmark measures.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Valence biases factual and counterfactual learning in opposite directions

Previous studies suggest that factual learning, that is, learning from obtained outcomes, is biased, such that participants preferentially take into account positive, as compared to negative, prediction errors. However, whether or not the prediction error valence also affects counterfactual learning, that is, learning from forgone outcomes, is unknown. To address this question, we analysed the ...

متن کامل

Effect of Counterfactual and Factual Thinking on Causal Judgments

The significance of counterfactual thinking in the causal judgment process has been emphasized for nearly two decades, yet no previous research has directly compared the relative effect of thinking counterfactually versus factually on causal judgment. Three experiments examined this comparison by manipulating the task frame used to focus participants’ thinking about a target event. Prior to mak...

متن کامل

Explanations of Counterfactual Inferences

When engaging in counterfactual thought, people must imagine changes to the actual state of the world. In this study, we investigated how people reason about counterfactual scenarios by asking participants to make counterfactual inferences about a series of causal devices (i.e., answer questions such as If component X had not operated [had failed], would components Y, Z, and W have operated?) a...

متن کامل

Towards Biologically Plausible Deep Learning

Neuroscientists have long criticised deep learning algorithms as incompatible with current knowledge of neurobiology. We explore more biologically plausible versions of deep representation learning, focusing here mostly on unsupervised learning but developing a learning mechanism that could account for supervised, unsupervised and reinforcement learning. The starting point is that the basic lea...

متن کامل

Counter-factual mathematics of counterfactual predictive models

In order to explain the distinct phenomenology of veridical and non-veridical percepts, Seth (2014) introduces the concept of counterfactual predictions to the Predictive Processing (PP) framework proposed by Clark (2013). The PP framework assumes that the brain generates predictions of its own sensory inputs based on generative models of the world that are learned over time. Seth (2014) propos...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2159-5399', '2374-3468']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i13.17377